← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/846/2023rejected

Yaseen S/O Gafoor Gawali v. Union Of India Thr. General Manager, Central Railway, Cst Mumbai

2023-03-23Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke2 pages

2023:BHC-NAG:16361 16caf846.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 846/2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 607/2021 (D) Yaseen S/O Gafoor Gawali Vs Union Of India Thr. General Manager, Central Railway, Cst Mumbai Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr R.G. Bagul, counsel for appellant.

Ms N.G. Chaubey, counsel for the respondent.

CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

DATED : 23/03/ 3.

1.

Heard.

2.

This is an application for speaking to minutes on the ground that, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India vs Radha Yadav1, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that the liability will accrue on the date of the accident and the amount applicable as on that date will be the amount recoverable. The compensation will be payable as applicable on the date of the accident with interest as may be considered reasonable on the date of the accident with interest as may be considered reasonable from time to time. However, if the amount so calculated is less than the amount prescribed on the date of the award of the Tribunal, the claimant will be entitled to the higher of the two amounts.

(2019) 3 SCC 410 rkn

16caf846.2023.odt 3.

Admittedly, this Court has awarded the interest on the compensation amount at the rate of Rs. 7.5%. At the time of passing of the judgment, this judgment was not placed on record, by placing reliance on it.

4.

Moreover, it is neither a typographical error or an accidental omission. Therefore, it cannot be corrected in speaking to minutes application. If the respondent is aggrieved by the rate of interest, so the respondent can file appropriate application for review of the said finding for regarding the rate of interest.

5.

In view of the above, the civil application is rejected. 6.

Liberty is granted to the respondent to file appropriate application.

JUDGE rkn