Divisional Controller, Office At M.S.R.T.C. Nagpur v. Jyoti Sanjay Bharat And Others

11.fa.185.20 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAF] No.895 of 2022 in First Appeal No.185 of 2020 Divisional Controller, Office at MSRTC, Nagpur vs.

Jyoti Sanjay Bharat & others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ms. Monali Pathade, Advocate for the Applicants/Respondents Mr. A.R. Fule, Advocate for the Non-Applicant/Appellant.

CORAM

: M.

S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : 18 th APRIL, .

This is an application for correcting the typographical mistake in recording the name of respondent No.3. In the cause title, the name of respondent No.3 is indicated as 'Master Lakesh s/o Sanjay Bharat' instead of 'Master Laksh s/o Sanjay Bharat', which is wrongly recorded before the Tribunal as well as before this Court. 02] The learned Counsel for the applicants submits that respondent Nos.1 & 4 have no objection in correcting the name of respondent No.3 and admit that the correct name of respondent No.3 is 'Master Laksh s/o Sanjay Bharat'. The learned Counsel for the appellants has no objection for such correction.

03] Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer

11.fa.185.20 2/2 clause (i). Consequential amendment in the record be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. Civil Application [CAF] No.84/2022:

The learned Counsel for the applicants/ respondents does not press this application.

02] The application is disposed of as not pressed. JUDGE *sandesh Signed by:SANDESH DAULATRAO WAGHMARE Private Secretary to the Hon'ble Judge