← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/231/2020allowed

Nilesh Panjabrao Pimpalkar v. State Of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Chandrapur Tah And Distchandrapur

2020-07-21Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala2 pages

54ABA 231.2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 231 OF 2020 (Nilesh Panjabrao Pimpalkar, Chandrapur Vs. State of Maharashtra) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Shri A.A. Dhawas, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. H.N. Jaipurkar, A.P.P. for the non-applicant. CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.

JULY 21, 2020.

Heard Shri A.A. Dhawas, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. H.N. Jaipurkar, learned A.P.P. for the non-applicant through Video Conferencing. 2.

The applicant is already protected by this Court by way of an ad interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 09/06/2020.

3.

Undisputedly, it is a case of love affair and physical relationship on the pretext of marriage. As the applicant failed to perform marriage with the prosecutrix, the report came to be lodged.

4.

A perusal of the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the State does not reveal any strong ground for custodial interrogation of the applicant, so also it does not discloses any criminal antecedent of the present applicant.

5.

In such circumstances, I am inclined to allow the application and the same is accordingly allowed.

54ABA 231.2020 6.

The ad interim protection earlier granted to the applicant by this Court vide order dated 09/06/2020 is hereby confirmed on the same conditions.

7.

The Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly.

8.

This order be communicated to the counsel appearing for the parties, either on the email address or on Whats app or by such other mode, as is permissible in law.

JUDGE Sumit