← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4389/2001withdrawn

Mrs.S.K.Nigam And ANR. v. Shri E.S. Titus And ANR.

2015-07-10Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale2 pages

WP4389-01 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4389/2001 (S.K. NIGAM & ANOTHER VERSUS E.S.TITUS, A.C. OF INCOME TAX & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Mohta h/f Shri A. Parchure, counsel for the petitioners. Shri A.M. Sudame, counsel for the R-1.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : JULY 10 , 2015.

PURSIS ST. NO.6796/2015.

Since the petitioner no.2 has expired, the name of the petitioner no.2 may be deleted from the array of the petitioners. The amendment should be carried out forthwith. JUDGE JUDGE APTE

WP4389-01 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4389/2001 (S.K. NIGAM & ANOTHER VERSUS E.S.TITUS, A.C. OF INCOME TAX & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Mohta h/f Shri A. Parchure, counsel for the petitioners. Shri A.M. Sudame, counsel for the R-1.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : JULY 10 , 2015.

Shri Mohta, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that in view of the objection raised by the respondents to the tenability of the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner are desirous of challenging the order before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, in this background. Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE APTE