Rashtriya Snehi Shikshan Sanstha Nagpur v. State Of Mah. Mumbai And 4 Others.

0501wp4296.01 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4296 OF 2001 Rashtriya Snehi Shikshan Sanstha VERSUS State of Maharashtra & Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri B.G.Kulkarni counsel for the petitioner. Ms. T. Khan AGP for the respondent/State.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 05 , 2016 .

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 13.09.1996 passed by the Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune by which an Administrator was appointed for a period of three years from 24.09.1996. While admitting the writ petition, this Court on 28.03.2002 granted interim relief and stayed operation of the aforesaid order. In view of the fact that the impugned order itself states that the administrator was appointed for three years with effect from 24.09.1996, in view of interim order the purpose for challenging the impugned order has been served as the period of three years had come to an end. Hence the writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE svk

0501wp4296.01