Mr. Ajay S/O. Gopalrao Chate v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police Inspector M.I.D.C. Nagpur And Another
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.284/ 2018 (Ajay s/o gopalrao Chate vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Mr. R.r.Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ketaki Joshi, Addl.Public Prosecutor for respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 27th April, 2018.
Heard.
By this Writ Petition, the petitioner has sought for the quashing and setting aside of the first information report registered against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 13(1)(d) read with section 13
(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Sections 465 and 471 of the Pen Code.
Since a charge sheet is not filed against the petitioner after registration of the offences, for a period of 13-years, the petitioner has sought for the quashing of the first information report.
Ms.Ketaki Joshi, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents states on the basis of the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent no.2 that after completing the investigation, it was noticed by the Investigating agency that there is no
material against both the accused, including the present petitioner and a "A" summary report is filed before the concerned Court on 19.9.2015.
It would not be necessary for this Court to quash and set aside the first information report registered against the petitioner as sought in this Writ Petition as the trial Court would now pass an appropriate order on the "A"summary report that is filed by the respondents. Hence, by accepting the statements made in the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent no.2, we dispose of the Criminal Writ Petition. Order accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE sahare