← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3508/2020disposed off as a withdrawn

Ramsons Industries Ltd. Nagpur Through Shri Rajesh Ramswarup Sarda And Others v. The Banking Ombudsman, Mumbai And Others

2023-07-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani2 pages

1 w.p. 3508.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Writ Petition No. 3508 of 2020 [Ramsons Industries Ltd., Nagpur through Shri R. R. Sarda and ors. ..vs.. The Banking Ombudsman, Byculla, Mumbai and ors.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. M. Anilkumar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. A. T. Purohit, Advocate for respondent 3 CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO AND M. W. CHANDWANI, J J.

DATED : 4- 7We are not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction.

2.

The issue involved is whether the petitioners are entitled to refund of the bank guarantee commission for the unexpired period.

3.

The petitioners are relying on circular dated 10-4-2019. The relevant portion of the circular reads thus :- "With view to increase guarantee business specially in case of consortium / multiple banking arrangement and in selective and highly deserving cases, the commission for unexpired period (for remaining full quarter only) may be refunded. The period less than a quarter be ignored. The minimum commission for a period of one quarter will continue to be

2 w.p. 3508.2020.odt charged. Such relaxations / refund of guarantee fee may be considered by the respective sanctioning authority up to sanctions of ZOCAC. In case of HO sanctions, relaxation / refund of guarantee fee may be considered by HOCAC-I."

4.

We are not inclined to substitute the business perspective of the bank by our view, particularly since there is no adequate material on record to look into the grievance of the petitioners that no reasons are given and in any event, the benefit of the discretionary power is denied unjustly.

5.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the civil court.

6.

With liberty as prayed, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

(M. W. Chandwani, J.) (Rohit B. Deo, J.) wasnik YUVRAJ WASNIK