Rani Akash Bhise v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Malegaon, Ps Malegaon, Tq. Malegaon Dist. Washim

2024:BHC-NAG:5477 31.aba.205.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.205 OF 2024 (Rani Akash Bhise Vs. State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R.S. Kurekar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. U.R. Phasate, APP for the State.

CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

DATED :- MAY 6, 2024 Apprehending arrest at the hands of police in connection with Crime No.483/2023 registered with Police Station Malegaon, Tq. Malegaon, District Washim for the offence punishable under Sections 353, 332, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the applicant approached to this Court for grant of pre-arrest bail.

2.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that as far as role of the present applicant is concerned which is only to the extent that she came at the spot after receipt of the telephonic call of the co-accused and assaulted the informant by kick blows. Learned Counsel for the applicant further submitted that considering the role her custodial interrogation is not required. Moreover, she is implicated falsely due to the previous enmity. After interim protection granted to her she has cooperated with the investigating agency. In view of that, she be released on anticipatory bail.

31.aba.205.2024.odt 3.

Learned APP strongly opposed the application on the ground that the custodial interrogation of the present applicant is required as there is specific allegation that she has assaulted public servant. In view of that, he prays for rejection of the application.

4.

Having heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State. Perused the investigation papers. Considering the role attributed to the present applicant, nothing is to be recovered from her, her custodial interrogation is not required. In view of that, the interim protection granted to the present applicant deserves to be confirmed.

5.

Hence, the application is allowed and the interim protection granted to the applicant vide order dated 27/03/2024 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions.

6.

The application is disposed of (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) *Divya