← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2209/2023dismissed

Utkarsh Griha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., Nagpur Thr. Secretary, Balkrushna S. Parvate And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Collector, Nagpur And Others

2024-04-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar2 pages

1 914-2209-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2209/2023 Utkarsh Griha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. and others Vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Nagpur and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. S.T. Khan, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. A.S. Fulzele, Addl. GP for Respondent No.1 Mrs. M.S. Naik, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr. A.C. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 5 CORAM: AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.

DATED : 2nd APRIL, 2024 The petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 for removal of encroachment committed by the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 on 9 meters public road situated on north of plot No.6 and to restore the public road to its original position. The Nagpur Improvement Trust, which is the planning authority has filed an affidavit dated 26/02/2024, contending, that on an inspection done on 25/09/2023 by the Building Engineer (North) along with the Division Officer, the area of plot No.6, which as per the original RL was 510.78 Sq.Mtrs. (18 X 30 meters) is in possession of the owners, however, when the length of the

2 914-2209-2023.odt plot is measured as 30 meters, it appears that 3 meters length of the plot overlapped with the back road of 9 meters of the plot. It is, however, stated in para 7 thereof, that no construction is found on the overlapped 3 meters length of 9 meters road and, therefore, there is no encroachment made by the owners of the plot No.6 / respondent No.3 to 5 on the public road. In that view of matter, we do not see any reason to entertain the present petition. The petition is dismissed. No costs.

(SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR,J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE,J.) MP Deshpande