Bombay High CourtCAW/771/2015rejected at admission stage

M/S. Grace Industries Ltd., Represented By Share Holder And Director Mr. Ajay S/O Puranlal Agrawal v. Maharashtra State Industrial Development Corporation (Midc) Thr.Regional Manager, Nagpur And Anothe

2015-04-21Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

WP5038-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NO.771/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5038/2014 (M/S GRACE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, NAGPUR VERSUS M.S.I.D.C., NAGPUR & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.Anilkumar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.M. Agnihotri, counsel for the R-1.

Shri Vinod Joshi, counsel for the Applicant/R-2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 21 , 2015.

We do not find on a reading of the writ petition and the civil application that it would be necessary to delete the respondent no.2 from the array of the respondents as though the respondent no.2 may not be a necessary party against whom a relief is sought, the respondent no.2 seems to be a proper party as it is on the basis of the audit-recommendations of the respondent no.2 that the impugned order is passed by the respondent no.1. Hence, we reject the application, at this stage. Stand over after Summer Vacations.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE