← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/319/2015others disposed off

Santosh Ratanlal Punekar (In Jail) v. The D.I.G. Prisons (E) (R), Nagpur And Another

2015-06-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.N. Deshmukh3 pages

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.319 OF 2015 (Santosh Ratanlal Punekar vs. The D.I.G. Prison (E)(R), Nagpur and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Ms. S.B. Saikhede, Advocate (appointed) for petitioner.

Ms. N. Tripathi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents.

---------- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED : JUNE 10, 2015 Heard Ms. Saikhede, learned Counsel appointed for petitioner, and Ms. Tripathi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents. Perused report submitted by Superintendent of Police, Wardha to respondent no.1 on 17/3/2015 as also reply affidavit filed by respondent no.1. The reply affidavit shows that though petitioner was released earlier on furlough leave, he had reported late voluntarily. In 2001, he reported

2/3 himself. In 2003, he reported late by 11 days. In 2005, he was required to be arrested after 26 days. Thereafter in 2014, he had surrendered voluntarily late by 15 days. He is in Open Prison and after his return through Police machinery in 2005, he had been again released in 2014. The report dated 17/3/2015 mentions that his wife is ready and willing to stand as surety.

Though petitioner in his application has stated that he should be released on cash security of Rs.2,000/-, learned Counsel for petitioner submits that as wife of petitioner is ready and willing to stand as surety, her surety can also be accepted by respondents.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that readiness and willingness of wife of petitioner to stand as surety is required to be verified by the respondents.

We direct the respondents to verify whether wife of petitioner is ready and willing to stand as surety. If she is so ready, in addition to cash security as proposed by petitioner in his application, after obtaining her bond in accordance

3/3 with law, the petitioner shall be released on furlough leave. The directions be complied with within six weeks. The criminal writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

The charges for Counsel appointed for the petitioner are fixed at rupees fifteen hundred. JUDGE JUDGE khj