← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/244/2020disposed off

Irfan Khan Shaban Khan v. State Of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Wani Tqwani Distyavatmal

2020-07-21Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala2 pages

60ABA 244.2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 244 OF 2020 (Irfan Khan Shaban Khan, Yavatmal Vs. State of Maharashtra) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Shri A.S. Shukla, Advocate a/w Shri M. Rathod, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri A.R. Chutke, A.P.P. for the non-applicant/State. CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.

JULY 21, 2020.

Heard Shri A.S. Shukla along with Shri M.

Rathod, learned Advocates for the applicant and Shri A.R. Chutke, learned A.P.P. for the State through Video Conferencing.

2.

The applicant is already protected by this Court by way of an ad interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 07/07/2020.

3.

As per the prosecution story, names of eighteen accused person have been mentioned in the First Information Report including the name of the present applicant. However, on careful reading of the contents in the said report, there appears to be no active role attributed to the present applicant. 4.

A perusal of the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the State also does not reveal any serious kind of injury or any vital weapon used by the present applicant.

5.

Accordingly, the ad interim protection earlier granted to him by this Court vide order dated

60ABA 244.2020 07/07/2020 is hereby confirmed on the same conditions.

6.

The Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly.

7.

This order be communicated to the counsel appearing for the parties, either on the email address or on Whats app or by such other mode, as is permissible in law.

JUDGE Sumit