Dr. Vaishali D/O Harinarayan Badiye And Another v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary And Others

1 ca 951.17 in wp 4381.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (W) No. 951 of 2017 in Writ Petition No. 4381 of 2016 (Dr. Vaishali Badiye and Anr. Vs. State and Ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R.L. Khapre, Counsel for the petitioners. CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND MRS. SWAPANA JOSHI, JJ DATED : October 31, 2017 Heard.

2.

Submission of petitioners / applicants is that out of total 9 posts they advertised, 6 have been filed in and, therefore, there are 3 vacancies. The petitioners before this Court claim parity and, therefore, seek order allowing them to continue in the employment as adhoc employees. Respondents in their reply have pointed out that through advertisement recruitments have been done and one post is still vacant. MPSC is processing the same and it will be filled in shortly.

3.

In view of the disputed questions involved, we grant the petitioners leave to make representation pointing out the workload. Thereafter, the same can be looked into by respondent No.2. If such representation is made by the petitioners within 3 weeks from today, respondent No.1 shall consider the same within 4 weeks.

2 ca 951.17 in wp 4381.16.odt 4.

With these directions, civil application stands disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE MP Deshpande