Bombay High CourtWP/2351/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Rajesh Bhojrajji Lakhotiya And Another v. Subhash Shalikram Ambalkar And Another

2016-04-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre1 pages

1 2104wp2351.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2351 OF 2016 (Rajesh Bhojrajji Lakhotiya & another Vs. Subhash Shalikram Ambalkar & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P. S. Gawai, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM : S. B. SHUKRE, J.

DATED : APRIL 21, 2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners.

By this petition the petitioners challenge legality and correctness of the order dated 18/3/2016 directing the petitioners to proceed first on the preliminary issue of jurisdiction.

In view of the provision of Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, creating a presumption regarding existence of jurisdiction to try all suits of civil nature, unless barred expressly or by necessary implication, I see no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. No interference with the impugned order is warranted. Writ petition is dismissed summarily.

JUDGE wwl