Baban Suryabhan Mundane v. State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Ashti, Tah. And Distwardha

36-ABA252.2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 252 OF 2020 IN LD-VC CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 688 OF 2020 (Mr. Baban Suryabhan Mundane vs. State of Maharashtra thr. P.S.O., P.S. Ashti, Tah. & Distt. Wardha) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Shri R.R. Vyas, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri S.B. Bissa, APP for the non-applicant / State. .....

CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.

JULY 24, 2020.

Heard Shri Vyas, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bissa, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through Video Conferencing. The applicant is protected vide ad-interim bail order dated 10/07/2020.

A perusal of the reply filed on behalf of the non-applicant / State does not show any justifiable ground for custodial interrogation of the present applicant.

As per Prosecution story, the applicant - Mr. Baban Suryabhan Mundane assaulted the informant and his father with wooden stick.

It is stated that the main accused in this case is already released on regular bail.

Considering the role attributed to the present applicant and considering the fact that the

36-ABA252.2020 investigation is almost completed, the custodial interrogation of the present applicant in my opinion, would not be necessary.

Furthermore, there are no criminal antecedent point out by the prosecution.

The order of interim protection is hereby confirmed on the same conditions.

The criminal application is allowed and stands disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE D.S. Baldwa