Bombay High CourtWP/2419/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Nishant Arunrao Joshi v. The Joint Director Of Higher And Technical Education, Amravati Division, Amravati And Others

2015-07-28Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar2 pages

WP2419-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2419/2015 (NISHANT ARUNRAO JOSHI VERSUS THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER & TECHNICAL EDUCATION, AMRAVATI & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.S. Patil, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri A.M. Deshpande, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri A.M. Sudame, counsel for the R-2 & 3.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : JULY 28 , 2015.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent no.1 to take immediate action on the proposal of the petitioner for appointment as an Assistant Librarian in the respondent no.3-College of Physical Education. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent no.1 to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner.

Shri Deshpande, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1, states that the Joint Director of Higher Education has probably not received the proposal of the petitioner as it is addressed to the Joint Director of Higher Education.

By accepting the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, we dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the respondent nos.2 and 3-Management to send a fresh proposal in respect of the petitioner to the respondent no.1, within a period of two weeks. If the proposal is submitted by the respondent nos.2 and 3-Management, the respondent no.1 is directed to decide the same as early as possible and positively within a period of six weeks from the receipt of the same.

WP2419-15 Order accordingly. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE