Amar S/O. Madhukarrao Wankhede v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Wadi, Dist. Nagpur

APPR100-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

Criminal Application (APPR) No.100 of 2019 (Amar s/o Madhukarrao Wankhede .vs. State of Maharashtra through PSO PS Wadi, Nagpur and another ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's orders Mr. M.J. Khan, APP for Respondent No.1/State. CORAM : Manish Pitale, J.

DATED : July 1, 2019.

On 24.06.2019 when this application was called out for hearing, the following order was passed:- " This application was listed on 02/05/2019 and this Court adjourned it beyond Summer Vacation at the request of the learned counsel for the applicant. Thereafter, this application was listed on 17/06/2019 when none appeared on behalf of the applicant and then application was adjourned for today. On this application being called out today, again none appears on behalf of the applicant, although the learned APP is present in the Court today and he has appeared for the non-applicant No.1. It is pointed out by the learned APP that the subject matter of challenge in the accompanying revision application is an order passed by the Court below, whereby application for discharge filed by the applicant was rejected. It appears that the applicant is not serious about pursuing the present application and that it has been filed only with a view to delay proceedings before the Court below.

APPR100-19.odt 2.

In view of the above, list this application on 01/07/2019 as a matter of last chance.

3.

It is made clear that if there is no representation on behalf of the applicant, the present application shall stand dismissed."

2.

Even today when the application is called out, none has appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the learned APP is present in Court to argue the matter. 3.

In view of the above, it is clear that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the present application. Hence dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE halwai