Tajuddin Baba Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Bhatkuli (Jain), Thr. President And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. Of School Education And Sports, Mumbai And ORS.

1 / 2 117.wp1910.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1910 OF 2025 Tajuddin Baba Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Amravati and anr. Vs.

State of Maharashtra, Thru. Its Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. P. B. Patil, Advocate for petitioners.

Mr. Nitin Autkar, AGP for respondent No.1.

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 17.04.2025.

Heard.

2.

The challenge raised in the petition to the extent of prayer clause (a) is not pressed. As such, the petition to that extent stands dismissed. 3.

However, it is brought to our notice that in case of the student teacher ratio, the grant of sanction for additional teaching staff is required to be approved by the State Government in view of Clauses 9 and 10 of the Government Resolution dated 13.07.2016, and it is claimed that the proposal to that effect forwarded by the petitioner is not only Prity

2 / 2 117.wp1910.2025 pending with the State Government for last about four months but even the Director of Education (Primary) has also not expedited the same at its level.

4.

That being so, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition with following orders: (i) We direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of sanction/approval for additional posts in the petitioner's institution in view of increase in the number of the students as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of three months from the date of production of copy of this order. 5.

The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs.

6.

Leave to approach afresh, in case if the prayer is not granted including leave to question the validity of Clauses 9 and 10 of the Government Resolution dated 13.07.2016.

(Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.) Prity