← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/128/2021delay condonatedrejected

Anuradha Wd/O Rajendra Rastogi And Another v. The Union Of India, Through General Manager, Central Railway, Cst Mumbai

2021-02-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai1 pages

1 45 caf 128.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 128 OF 2021 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (MCA) ST. NO. 6927 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 19351 OF 2019 Anuradha s/o Rajendra Rastogi and anr.

..VS..

The Union of India, thr. General Manager - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. Sumesha Chaudhari, Advocate for Appellants. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 25/02/2021 These applications are filed for condonation of delay and for restoration of appeal which was dismissed for non-removal of office objection.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Appellants states that the office objections will be removed within two weeks. 3.

In the light of the said statement and in view of the reasons stated in the applications, the delay is condoned and appeal is ordered to be restored subject to removal of office objection.

4.

Both Applications are disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Trupti