← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3820/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Ravindra Gajbhiye S/O Hansdas Gajbhiye v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation Through The Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur And 3 Others

2015-09-03Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3820/2015 Ravindra Gajbhiye s/o Hansdas Gajbhiye ...Versus...

Nagpur Municipal Corporation through the Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri G.L. Bajaj, Advocate for petitioner Shri N.S. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 4 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 03.09.2015 The only prayer made in the petition is a direction to the Municipal Corporation to decide the representationapplication of the petitioner within a time-frame. Shri Deshpande, the learned Counsel for the Corporation states that the representation-application of the petitioner has been decided on 14.5.2015 and the cause for filing the petition would not survive.

In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the Corporation, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar