← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1983/2022disposedoff

Madhukar S/O. Yashwant Sadmek v. The Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer And Another

2023-10-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prithviraj Keshavrao Chavan,Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke3 pages

2023:BHC-NAG:15718-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1983 OF 2022 Madhukar s/o Yashwant Sadmek Aged about 56 years, Occ.Assistant Teacher (Retired), R/o. Prabhag No.-07, Aheri Taluka Aheri, Dist.-Gadchiroli .. Petitioner

Versus

1] The Zillha Parishad Gadchiroli, Through its Chief Executive OfÏcer.

.. Respondents 2] The Chief Audit and Finance OfÏcer Zillha Parishad, Gadchiroli Mr. P.S.Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Sachin Zoting, Advocate for respondents.

CORAM

:

PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN AND URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, JJ.

DATE :

27th OCTOBER, 2023.

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN J.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel Mr.Sachin Zoting, waives service of notice on behalf of respondents. The writ petition is taken up forthwith for final disposal.

(2) The petitioner was appointed as 'Assistant Teacher' in Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, who is admittedly a Class-III employee. The petitioner was retired voluntarily from the services of the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli on 19/08/2019. By the impugned order dated 15/07/2020, the respondent No.2 had recovered an amount of Rs.1,33,313/- being an excess payment made to the petitioner.

(3) Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed useful reliance on a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and others vs. Rafiq Masih reported in 2015 (4) SCC 334. The issue raised in the petition is no more res-integra in view of various pronouncements. (4) Learned counsel for the respondents is fair enough to admit that the excess amount which is recovered from the petitioner, needs to be refunded.

(5) In that view of the matter, the impugned order dated 15/07/2020, is quashed and set aside.

(6) The respondents shall refund the amount of

Rs.1,33,313/- to the petitioner within eight weeks. If the respondents fail to refund / credit the amount in the account of the petitioner within eight weeks, the said amount shall carry interest @6.00%p.a. till the entire amount is refunded. (7) The Writ Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. No costs.

Rule is made absolute.

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE,J.) (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN,J.)