← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/251/2010dismissed

Smt. Sadhana Wd/O Ramkrushna Gawande v. Kantilal S/O Jethalal Ruparel And ANR

2019-07-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo2 pages

1 1.apeal251.2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2010 Smt. Sadhana wd/o Ramkrushna Gawande ..VS..

Shri Kantilal S/o Jethalal Ruparel and anr.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None appear for appellant.

Shri N.B. Jawade, APP for respondent No. 2.

CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO,J.

DATED : 31 st JULY, 2019.

.

Seen the praecipe dated 08.03.2019 filed by the learned counsel for the appellant.

2.

In view of the statements in the praecipe which are supported by the postal receipt and acknowledgment of notice, the learned counsel Shri S.M. Nafde, is discharged. 3.

The appellant has not filed the private paperbook. 4.

None appears on behalf of the appellant.

5.

Keeping the appeal pending would be futile since the appellant is obviously not interested in prosecuting this appeal which challenges the acquittal of the respondent 1 of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

2 1.apeal251.2010 6.

In exercise of inherent powers, I dismiss the appeal with costs of Rs. 5,000/-.

7.

If any application for restoration is preferred, the Registry shall ensure that the direction to pay costs is complied with.

JUDGE Prity G.