Rama Vishwanath Dandge v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Revenue And Forest Dept. Mantralaya Mumbai And Another
1/2 146wp3214.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.3214 OF 2016 Rama Vishwanath Dandge -vsState of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, through its Secretary and another ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.M.D.Awachat, Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.V.P.Gangane, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 14.06.2016.
Heard.
By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to appoint the petitioner on the post of Peon in the Collectorate, Buldhana or in any other Government Office on the basis of the recommendations of the Government and also because the petitioner is a deserted woman and possesses the 'Deserted Woman Certificate'.
The relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted. Merely because the petitioner is deserted and the petitioner has three children, the petitioner cannot be appointed as a Peon in the Office of Collectorate. The petitioner had applied in pursuance of the advertisement and eligible candidates that were much more qualified than the petitioner are stated to have been selected and appointed. The petitioner was not found to be meritorious and was, therefore, not appointed on the post of Peon in the Office of Collectorate. Merely because the petitioner does not have any means of livelihood and has three children, a direction cannot be issued in exercise of Writ
2/2 146wp3214.16 Jurisdiction against the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Peon. The recommendation letters of some influential persons cannot be helpful to the petitioner in seeking appointment. Since no case is made out by the petitioner for grant of relief, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed.
It is dismissed as such, with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE *jAISWALk