← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPA/354/2024allowed

Mangesh S/O Suresh Zambare v. State Of Mha. Thr. Pso Ramnagar Dist.Wardha

2024-07-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. A. Sanap3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLI. (APPA) NOs. 898 OF 2023 AND 354 OF 2024 I N CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.11 OF 2023 Mangesh s/o Suresh Zambare Vs.

State of Maharashtra, through PSO, Ramnagar, District Wardha _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr Mahesh Rai, Advocate for appellant.

Mr Suraj Hulke, APP for State.

CORAM :

G.A. SANAP, J.

DATE :

02.07.2024 Heard learned Advocate for the appellant and learned APP for the respondent/State.

2.

The appellant/accused, on conviction for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years. He is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years under Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code. These two applications have been made by the appellant/accused for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

3.

The main ground for suspension of sentence is his medical health condition. It is stated that he is suffering from type II Fissure In Ano. Earlier, he was

operated for this ailment. However, again the said problem has occurred and aggravated. It is stated that he would like to take proper treatment in private hospital. Learned Advocate submitted that for a limited period of four months, the sentence may be suspended, so that, he would be able to take treatment in private hospital. 4.

On going through the record and proceedings and particularly report received from the Medical Officer attached to the jail shows that earlier, he was operated for type II Fissure In Ano. The record shows that again this problem has aggravated. It is not the case of the appellant that treatment is not provided to him. It appears that he has no faith in the said treatment.

5.

In my view, considering the medical condition the submission of learned Advocate to suspend the substantive sentence of four months is fully justified. 6.

Accordingly, the applications are allowed as follows:- i) The sentence awarded by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-1 Wardha in Sessions Case No.61/2017 vide judgment and order dated 31/12/2022 shall remain suspended for four months from the date of release.

ii) Appellant Mangesh s/o Suresh Zambare be

released on bail, on his furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) and one surety in the like amount .

iii) The surety be submitted before the Trial Court. 7.

The appellant/accused shall surrender in terms of this order on completion of four months.

(G. A. SANAP, J.) manisha