Smt. Hasina Begam Mohd. Shafiq v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. Kamptee, Nagpur And 8 Others

2304appa264.14 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.264 OF 2014 (Hasina Begum Mohd. Shafiq vs. State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri R.R. Gaur, Advocate (appointed) for applicant. Ms. T. Udeshi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent no.1.

Ms. Vaidya, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 8. Ms. D.K. Gawali, Advocate for respondent nos.3 to 6. Shri A.K. Bhangade, Advocate for respondent no.7. ---------- CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED : APRIL 23, 2015 Learned Counsel for the applicant/ appellant submits that in terms of the judgment of this Court in the case of Balasaheb Rangnath Khade vs. State of Maharashtra and others {2013(3) Mh.L.J. (Cri.) 99}, there is no provision for limitation in filing an appeal by a private party and, therefore, application for condonation of delay was not required to be made.

In view of the present legal position, we

2304appa264.14 2/2 accept the contention of learned Counsel for the applicant/appellant and waive the office objection about limitation. The criminal application is disposed of.

Criminal Appeal be registered as a regular Criminal Appeal.

JUDGE JUDGE khj