← Library
Bombay High CourtCAS/1224/2017admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Manikrao Laxmanrao Potey v. Ramrao S/O Jairam Talokar (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Suresh S/O Ramrao Talokar And Others

2018-10-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

CAS1224-17 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.S. NO. 1224/2017 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 7843/2017 (MANIKRAO LAXMANRAO POTEY VERSUS RAMRAO JAIRAM TALOKAR THR LR's SURESH RAMRAO TALOKAR & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.G. Kavimandan, counsel for applicant.

Shri S.C. Mehadia, counsel for the NA-3.

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 17 , 2018.

Perused contents of the application. The cause of delay is mentioned in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application. The prayer is opposed by the non-applicant no.3 by filing reply. It is submitted that the reasons assigned are not sufficient.

Considering the averments made in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application, it is found that the delay is not deliberately caused. Same is therefore condoned.

Civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE APTE