← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2329/2020disposedoff

Gajanan Apparao Bhalekar v. Honble Minister Of State, The State Of Maharasthra, Ministry Of Urban Development, Mumbai And Other

2021-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote2 pages

1 W.P.No.2329.2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2020 Gajanan Apparao Bhalekar, ..VS..

Hon'

ble Minister of State, the State of Maharashtra, Ministry of Urban Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors., --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A. A. Dhawas, Advocate for petitioner.

Shri A. A. Madiwale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATED : 08.04.2021 Hearing is conducted through Video Conferencing and all the learned Advocates agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2.

Heard Shri Dhawas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Madiwale, learned A.G.P. who appears by waiving notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 3.

Shri Madiwale, learned A.G.P. states that he has taken instructions on telephone from Mr. Patil, Under Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai. He further states that as per the instructions received by him from Mr. Patil, notices have been issued by the Hon'ble Minister on application dated 18.12.2018 but, he has no further instructions as regards the time period within which the application can be considered and decided appropriately.

2 W.P.No.2329.2020 4.

Now, it is clear to us that respondent No.1 is already seized of the matter and therefore, it would be appropriate that his decision in the matter is made time bound. Accordingly, we request the respondent No.1 to decide the application dated 18.12.2018, in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order.

The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Kirtak