Sau. Archana W/O Murlidhar Wakode v. Shri. Murlidhar S/O Krushnarao Wakode

1 cao863.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

Civil Application (CAO) No. 863 of 2015 in Family Court Appeal 31 of 2015 (Mrs. Archana w/o Murlidhar Wakode Vs. Murlidhar s/o Krushnarao Wakode) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders Mrs. Prajakta Choudhari, Advocate for applicant Shri A. M. Ghare, Advocate for respondent CORAM : Smt. V. A. Naik and P. B. Varale, JJ.

DATE : 16-11-2015.

Heard.

Perused the contents of the application. Also perused the judgment of the Family Court. In the circumstances of the case, the respondent is directed to pay maintenance pendent lite to the applicant at the rate at which it was granted to the applicant for herself by the Family Court during the pendency of the Hindu Marriage Petition filed by the respondent. The civil application stands disposed of.

At this stage, the counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is required to bear the expenses of the education of the son and the respondent is not fulfilling his duties in regard to .....2/-

2 cao863.15.odt that.

The counsel for the respondent disputes the statement made on behalf of the applicant.

The parties are free to agitate the said issue and the issue in regard to permanent alimony before the appropriate forum. Order accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE wasnik ...../-