Girish S/O Mahadeorao Gurao And Others v. State Of Maha. Ministry Of Cooperation And Textile, Mumbai Through Secretary And Others

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO.2123 OF 2021 PETITIONERS :-1. Girish Mahadeorao Gurao, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Private ,R/o 106, Chakradhar Nagar, Near Ayodhya Nagar Post Office, Nagpur, Tq.

and Dist. Nagpur.

2.

Prakash Champatrao Wandile, Aged about 65 years, Occup.Retired.

R/o Plot No.7, Bante Layout, Wardha Road, Somalwada , Tq. and Dist. Nagpur 440025.

3. Ishwar Chindhuji Ashtankar, Aged about 70 years, Occup.Private, R/o Plot No.138/B, Pande Layout, Khamla, Nagpur-440025,.Tq. and Dist. Nagpur.

4. Prakash Onkarrao Gorle, Aged about 54 years, Occup.Business, R/o Plot No.111/B, Dubey Nagar, Hudkeshwar Road, Nagpur, Tq. and Dist. Nagpur.

...VERSUS...

RESPONDENTS :- 1.State of Maharashtra, Ministry of Cooperation and Textile, Through its Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

2. Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, City-1, Nagpur, Having Office at Chatrapati Square, Wardha Road, Nagpur, Mantralya, Mumbai-32.

2/3 3.Indraprastha Housing Co-operative Societies, Nagpur, Registration No. 790, Through it's Liquidator, Shri Nitin M. Nirgudkar, Having Office at 32-A, Third Floor, Chatrapati Square, Wardha Road, Nagpur.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. H.V. Siras counsel for the petitioners.

Mr.N.R.Patil, AGP for the respondent nos.1 and 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SUNIL B.SHUKRE & ANIL S.KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 22.06 .20 .

O R A L J U D G M E N T (Per :Sunil B.Shukre, J.) 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2, who appears by waiving notice for them. There is no need to issue the notice to respondent no.3, as the learned counsel for the petitioners is pressing for only relief as prayed for in prayer clause (a), which is sought against respondent no.2 only.

2.

Hence, Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3/3 3.

The Writ Petition is partly allowed.

4.

Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation dated 22.03.2021 of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of the appearance of the petitioners before respondent no.2. Rule as above.

5.

Petitioners to appear before respondent no.2 on 28.06.2021.

JUDGE JUDGE