Bombay High CourtCAO/1193/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Narayanprasad S/O Hariprasad Chourasia v. The City Of Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Through Its Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur

2017-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

cao.1193.15 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION [CAO] NO.1193 OF 2015 IN CIVIL APPLICATION [MCA] ST. NO.8488 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.143 OF 2012 (D) (Narayan s/o Hajariprasad Chourasia vs.

The City of Nagpur Municipal Corporation) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= OfÏce notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

CORAM

: V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATE : 29 th NOVEMBER, 2017.

Counsel for the applicant is absent. Mrs. S.S. Jachak, learned Counsel for the non-applicant/ Corporation is present.

This application was called for consideration on 22/11/2017. On the said date, the counsel for the applicant was absent and, therefore, in order to give one more chance by way of last chance, the application was kept for further consideration today. In the morning session, when the application was called out, nobody appeared for the applicant. The matter was, therefore, kept in the second half. Even in the second half, nobody is appearing for the applicant nor there is a request for adjourning the matter.

The application is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.

JUDGE *sdw