Radheshyam Chaturbhuj Bajaj v. Abdul Nabi Sattar, Honble Minister Of State For Revenue, Mumbai

53cp 221.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION (CP) 221/2023 IN WRIT PETITION 4263/2022 (D) RADHESHAM CHATURBHUJ BAJAJ VS ABDUL NABI SATTAR, HON'BLE MINISTER OF STATE FOR REVENUE, MUMBAI ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court'

s or Judge'

s Order Coram, appearances, Court'

s Orders or directions and Registrar'

s order__________________________________________________________ Mr. M.G. Sarda, Advocate for the petitioner CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO AND M. W. CHANDWANI, J.J.

DATED : 10/07/2023 Heard.

2.

We have gone through the order dated 30.08.2022, non-compliance of which is complained. The relevant para is read as under:- "In these facts and as the appeal is pending for more than two years, it is directed that the said proceedings filed under Section 257 of the Code before the State Government shall be decided expeditiously and preferably within a period of eight weeks from receipt of copy of this order. Due notice shall be given to the revisional applicants in both the proceedings as well as the present petitioner before the matter is taken up for consideration.

With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs."

SM Gate

53cp 221.2023.odt 3.

We do not find that by not deciding the revision application of the petitioner within eight weeks, in any way, is contemptuous act on the part of the respondent. 4.

We find no merit in the petition. Hence, the contempt petition is dismissed.

(M. W. CHANDWANI, J.) (ROHIT B. DEO J.) SM Gate