Bombay High CourtPIL/65/2013dispossed offdismiss for default

All India Jamiatual Quresh A Social Organisation Of Quresh Community Thr. Haji Altaf Ahmed Qureshi v. State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary Urban Development Dept. And 2 Others

2016-03-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.N. Deshmukh2 pages

pil.65.13 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Public Interest Litigation No.65 of 2013 (All India Jamiatual Qureshi, through its Vice President, Kamptee vs.

State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Urban Development Department and others) with Writ Petition No.2120 of 2013 (Dr. Sandip Rameshkumar Kashyap and another vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Urban Development and others) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri S.P. Kshirsagar, Advocate for the Petitioner in PIL No.65/2013. Mrs. Bharti Dangre, Government Pleader for R-1 & R-2 in PIL No.65/2013 and for R-1 to R-5 in WP No.2120/2013.

Shri A.M. Quazi, Advocate for R-3 in PIL No.65/2013 and for R-6 in WP No.2120/2013. Shri S.S. Sanyal, Advocate for R-4 in PIL No.65/2013. Shri K.S. Malokar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 and 8 in WP No.2120/2013.

CORAM

: B.R. GAVAI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE : 3 rd MARCH, 2016.

The present public interest litigation has been filed for directions directing the respondents to allot D.P. Reservation No.56, City Survey No.29 at Kamptee for the purpose of construction of slaughter house or allot alternate place for the said purpose.

Mrs. Bharti Dangre, learned Government Pleader states that in the development plan for Nagpur Metropolitan, under which the area of Kamptee Municipal Council also comes, there is a reservation at Item No.204 for slaughter house.

pil.65.13 2/2 We, therefore, find that when there is a reservation for slaughter house for a larger area, the purpose of the petition would be served inasmuch as the members of the petitionerUnion can get their animals to the said slaughter house. We, therefore, dispose of the said petition. However, the State Government to expeditiously construct the said slaughter house on the plot reserved for the said purpose. In view of disposal of the matter finally, the civil application for intervention becomes infructuous and the same is disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE *sdw