← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/923/2020ca disposed off

M/S Rahul Properties, Through Its Authorized Partner Shri. Gaurav S/O Shri. Ashok Agrawala v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Dept. Of Urban Development, Mumbai And Another

2020-09-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala2 pages

wp3485.2018+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAW NO. 921/2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3485/2018 (Krishna B. Diwane & ors. vs. State & anr.) WITH CAW NO. 919/2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3470/2018 (Bhaduji S. Nagrare & anr. vs. State & anr.) WITH CAW NO. 920/2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3471/2018 (Taibai K. Yewale & ors. vs. State & anr.) WITH CAW NO. 923/2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3476/2018 (M/s Rahul Properties vs. State & anr.) WITH CAW NO. 922/2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3486/2018 (Sheikh Hassan Haji Ibrahim Patel & ors. vs. State & anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri U.P. Dable, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in all petitions Ms. H.N. Jaipurkar, AGP for the respondent no. 1 in all petitions Shri G.A. Kunte, Advocate for the respondent no.2 in all petitions CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, JJ.

DATED : 17/09/2020 Hearing was conducted through video conferencing and the learned counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

wp3485.2018+ 2] In all these petitions, applications for withdrawal of the petitions have been filed. According to the petitioners, they are given TDR and therefore their grievance do not survive. We therefore permit the petitioners to withdraw these petitions.

3] The writ petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn.

4] In view of the withdrawal of these petitions, civil application, if any, filed in these petitions do not survive. The same is, therefore, disposed of as such.

5] The order be communicated to the counsel appearing for the parties, either on the e-mail address or on WhatsApp or by such other mode, as is permissible in law. JUDGE JUDGE ANSARI