← Library
Bombay High CourtFCA/44/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Vinayak Shriram Meshram v. Smt. Asha W/O Vinayak Meshram

2015-08-13Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar2 pages

1308fca44.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Family Court Appeal No.44 of 2014 (Vinayak Shriram Meshram, Nagpur v. Smt. Asha w/o Vinayak Meshram, Nagpur) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri M.B. Agasti, Advocate for Appellant.

Shri S.D. Malke, Advocate for Respondent.

Coram : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik & A.M. Badar, JJ.

Date : 13 th August, 2015 The learned counsel for the parties have tendered a pursis in the Court today. The same is accepted on record. The pursis is signed by the appellant-husband and the respondent-wife. It is also signed by the counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondent. The parties are personally present in the Court today. We have perused the contents of the pursis. The terms in the pursis are just and reasonable. The respondent-wife, who is now occupying the entire house, has agreed to vacate the ground floor of the house and hand it over to the husband immediately. The wife has also agreed that she would not interfere with the possession of the husband on the ground floor. Initially, the husband would be put in possession of two rooms and kitchen on the ground floor with one wash room, and the son of the parties, named Shilwant, would use a bed room and a separate wash room attached to the same till he desires to use the same. The parties have agreed that they would not raise any dispute against each other nor would they interfere with the

1308fca44.14.odt occupation of the premises of the respective parties on the ground and the first floor, in future. The husband would withdraw the Family Court Appeal No.43 of 2014 in view of this compromise. We have enquired from the parties, who are present in Court, whether they are ad idem on the terms of the settlement, as mentioned in the pursis. They have answered in the affirmative and have stated that the terms are 'agreed terms' between the parties. In view of the aforesaid, this Family Court Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise.

A decree be drawn accordingly.

Judge Judge.

Lanjewar