← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2053/2018dispossed offdismiss for default

Sau. Shitalabai Deepakrao Tidke, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Lakhpuri, Akola v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through The Secretary For Rural Development Dept. Mumbai And Others

2020-09-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale1 pages

1 / 1 02-WP 2053.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2053 OF 2018 Sau. Shitalabai Deepakrao Tidke vs.

The State of Maharashtra and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, Court' s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri. S. M. Vaishnav, counsel for petitioner. Smt. A. R. Kulkarni, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri. S. J. Kadu, counsel for respondent No.6. CORAM : MANISH PITALE J.

DATED : 14/09/2020 Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and the learned counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with passage of time the petition has been rendered infructuous.

3.

Hence, disposed of as infructuous.

4.

The order be communicated to the counsel appearing for the parties, either on the email address or on WhatsApp or by such other mode, as is permissible in law.

JUDGE KOLHE/P.A.