Purushottam Pandurang Dalke v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Rural Development, Mumbai And Others

141wp2392.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2392 of 2014 (Purushottam Pandurang Dalke .vs. State, through its Secretary, Rural Dev. Deptt., Mumbai and Ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.S.J.Kadu, Adv. for the petitioner.

Mr.N.R.Rode, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr.S.D.Chopde, Adv. for respondent no.4.

Mr.Rahul Shinde, Adv. for respondent nos. 6 to 9. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.

DATE : 14th JANUARY, 2015.

During arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the election program is already declared. He is, however, seeking time to verify the same and make a definite statement in this respect. Learned Counsel for the other respondents state that they are still awaiting instructions.

The election program is already declared. We find that the grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is rendered infructuous. However, if any other cause of action arises or if the present grievance subsists, we grant liberty to the petitioner to approach again. In the circumstances, with the liberty aforementioned, we dispose of the present petition. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE jaiswal