Lalan Kishor Singh v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Finance Department, Mumbai And Another

163mca93.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

M.C.A. No.93 of 2017 in P.I.L. No.99 of 2014 (D) (Lalan Kishor Singh vs. Mah. Govt. and another) ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's orders Applicant-in-person.

Ms Nivedita Mehta, A.G.P. for Respondents.

CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : 16.3.2017.

Heard.

By the present Misc. Civil Application, review is sought on the ground that though non-applicant no.2 has assessed the Sales Tax of All India Reporter Company at Rs.1,88,89,067/-, the matter is settled only for Rs.7,000/-.

Entire details are given in the affidavit-in-reply filed by Mr.Poonamchand Agrawal, who is working as a Joint Commissioner, Sales Tax, Nagpur. It is stated in the said affidavit that the amount of Rs.7,000/- is only with regard to payment of penalty for non-filing of Sales Tax returns for seven years. It is submitted that, insofar as the Sales Tax dues are concerned, the assessment orders are already passed by the

163mca93.17.odt Competent Authority, which are subject matters of appeals before the Competent Forums. Similarly, an averment is made with regard to other persons mentioned in the review application.

In that view of the matter, we do not find that any case is made out for review. Hence, the Misc. Civil Application is rejected. No order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE jaiswal