← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/294/2021other disposed off

Vaibhav S/O Kailas Raut v. State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Deolapar Dist.Nagpur And Another

2021-08-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Amit B. Borkar1 pages

15.Cr.Appeal No.294.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.294/2021 Vaibhav S/o. Kailas Raut Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders or directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Amol Hunge, Advocate for the Appellant.

Ms M.A. Barabde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1/State. CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : 06/08/2021.

1.

Shri Amol Hunge, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that this appeal under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was filed since the application for anticipatory bail was rejected. This appeal was never listed before this Court. There was no order in favour of the appellant.

2.

Shri Hunge, learned counsel for the appellant submits that during pendency of this appeal the appellant is arrested, therefore, the appeal has rendered infructuous. His statement is accepted.

3.

The criminal appeal is disposed of, as infructuous.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE RGurnule