← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2856/2024disposed off

Anshul S/O Siddharth Meshram, Since In Foreign (Singapore) Thr. Father Siddharth Sukhdev Meshram v. State Of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. Of Social Justice And Special Assistance, Mumbai And ANR.

2025-07-02Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:6239-DB 1/2 wp-2856-24(j).odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2856 OF 2024 Anshul S/o Siddharth Meshram, aged about 23 years, Occ. Student, since in Foreign (Singapore) through his father Siddharth Sukhdev Meshram, aged about 58 years, Occ. Retired, R/o Flat No. A-309, K-Square Apartment, Narendra Nagar, Nagpur

...Petitioner

// VERSUS // 1.

State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of Social Justice and Special Assistance, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032 2.

Social Welfare Department, State of Maharashtra through its Commissioner, Address Social Welfare Commissioner, 3, Church Road, Pune 411 001 ... Respondents Shri H.R.Gadhia, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.M.Joshi, AGP for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR & PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 2nd JULY, 2025.

ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

Sknair

2/2 wp-2856-24(j).odt 2.

By the present petition, the petitioner is praying to include the name in the list of beneficiaries published along with Government Resolution dated 6th September, 2023 for being entitled for Rajarshi Shahu Scholarship Scheme for Higher Education in foreign Countries for Schedule Caste Students.

3.

It is submission of the parties that this issue has been dealt with by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4056 of 2023 decided on 8th May, 2024.

4.

In view of above, it is the submission of petitioner that the respondent no.1 be directed to consider the judgment delivered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4056 of 2023 and accordingly take appropriate decision in the matter.

5.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader consented to this proposal.

6.

In view of same, respondent no.1 is directed to consider the grievances of the petitioner by treating the present petition as representation and pass an appropriate order in the matter within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 7.

Writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.

[PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.] [SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR, J.] Sknair