← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/571/2020dismissed

Jagdish @ Chintya S/O Chanderao @ Chandrakant Ghuge And Another v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Barshitakli, Tq. Barshitakli, Dist. Akola

2020-09-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo2 pages

1 ba571.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 571 OF 2020 ( Jagdish @ Chintya s/o Chanderao @ Chandrakant Ghuge and another ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through PS Barshitakli ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Zeeshan Haq, Counsel for the applicants, Smt. S.S. Jachak, Addl.P.P. for the non-applicant. CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATED : 09-09-2020 Hearing was conducted through video conferencing and the learned Counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2.

Heard.

3.

It would not be possible to entertain the submissions on merits since the earlier application for bail was withdrawn when this Court expressed its inclination to dismiss the same.

4.

The submission that there is no progress in the trial too cannot be entertained since vide order dated 10-2-2020, this Court directed that the trial be concluded within one and half years from the date of the order. The trial Court has sufficient time to conclude the trial and in any event, the prevailing situation is extra ordinary.

2 ba571.20 5.

The application is dismissed with liberty to move afresh, if the trial is not concluded within the period mandated by this Court.

JUDGE adgokar