← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/885/2025allowed

Lalit S/O Yashwantrao Raut v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai And Others

2025-04-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

1 wp215.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 885 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 215 OF 2023 ( Mr. Lalit s/o Yashwant Raut ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Y.N. Sambre, Counsel for the petitioner, Ms. T. Khan, A.G.P. for respondent No.1, Mr. G.A. Kunte, Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 5. CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATE : 24-04-2025 The petitioner has moved this petition to permit him to amend the petition as, during its pendency, subsequent events took place, and, therefore, he wants to bring these facts on record.

2.

Considering the reasons disclosed in the application and no objection given by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 5, we deem it appropriate to allow the application as prayed.

3.

The application is allowed as prayed. The petitioner is directed to carry out the amendment within two weeks from today and supply the amended copy of the petition to the respondents within two weeks thereafter.

2 wp215.23.odt Writ Petition No.215 of 2023 List the petition after Summer Vacation.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) adgokar