The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Chandrapur And Another v. Dhirendra Ambadas Ingole And Another

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR First Appeal No.969 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Shankar Ganpat Gawande) with First Appeal No.520 of 2009 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Deepak Pundlikrao Bute) with First Appeal No.790 of 2010 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Digambar Janardhan Mandekar [dead] through L.Rs.) with First Appeal No.881 of 2009 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Vitthal Kisan Chawardol) with First Appeal No.892 of 2009 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Motiram Laxman Karlekar) with First Appeal No.906 of 2009 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Dattu Adku Thakre) with First Appeal No.

966 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Anirudha Chandrashekhar Thakare and others) with First Appeal No.967 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Dnyaneshwar Keshao Mahalle and others) with First Appeal No.968 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Baban Punjab Deshmukh and another) with First Appeal No.970 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Chandrashekhar Laxman Thakare) with First Appeal No.971 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Vinayak Bhima Haibati @ Mahalle and others) with First Appeal No.972 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs.

2/3 First Appeal No.973 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Vithal Anandrao Borkar) with First Appeal No.974 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Vithoba Bhawanji Yelke) with First Appeal No.975 of 2011 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and another vs. Dhirendra Ambadas Ingole and another) with First Appeal No.997 of 2009 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Tulsabai Ganpat Chawardol and another) with First Appeal No.1176 of 2009 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Madhukar Tanba Bobde) with First Appeal No.1359 of 2009 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Madhukar Tanbaji Bobde) with First Appeal No.

1377 of 2008 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and another vs. Pandurang Dadaji Bobde and another) with First Appeal No.1484 of 2008 (State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others vs. Keshao Tatyaji Wankhade [dead] through L.Rs.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri H.R. Dhumale, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the appellants.

CORAM

: A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : APRIL 13, 2016.

In all these appeals, a challenge has been raised to the judgment of the Reference Court partly enhancing the amount of compensation in favour of the claimants in the proceedings under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

3/3 Shri H.R. Dhumale, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the appellants in all the appeals, on instructions, states that the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gondpipri has issued communication dated 21/03/2016 in which it has been stated that all the appeals pertaining to Dindora Barrage, Tahsil Warora, District Chandrapur are to be withdrawn. The communication dated 21/03/2016 is taken on record and marked as 'Document- X' for identification.

Similarly, a pursis has also been filed on behalf of the Executive Engineer making similar request. In view of aforesaid, all the appeals are permitted to be withdrawn. The appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. The appellants would be entitled to receive the court fees in accordance with the rules. The respective claimants would be entitled to receive the amount of compensation as deposited with accrued interest in terms of the judgment of the Reference Court.

Order accordingly. No costs.

Authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the learned A.G.P. to act upon.

JUDGE *sdw