The State Of Mah.Thr.Pso Wardha v. Yogesh Arunrao Raut And 7 Others

apeal386.05 19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.386 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Police Station Wardha City ..vs..

Yogesh Arunrao Raut and ors ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Shri S.M.Ukey, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Appellant/State.

None appears for the Respondents.

CORAM

: V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : JULY 17, 2019.

1.

On 9.7.2019, learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri S.M.Ukey for the appellant/State, submitted that he got an unconfirmed information about death of respondent No.1-Yogesh Raut; respondent No.2-Vyankatesh Mudliyar; respondent No.5-Sachin Kamble, and respondent No.7-Nagorao Lande, and prayed for a week's time to make a statement in that respect.

2.

Today, when the present appeal was called out, learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri S.M.Ukey for the appellant/State, submitted that he has written instructions from Police Inspector, Wardha (City) that respondent Nos.1, 2, 5, and 7 have expired.

3.

Copy of the said written instructions is taken on record along with it connected documents and marked the .....2/-

apeal386.05 19 same as "Exhibit X" for identification.

4.

In view of the above, the present appeal on behalf of the State stands abated against respondent No.1Yogesh Raut; respondent No.2-Vyankatesh Mudliyar; respondent No.5-Sachin Kamble, and respondent No.7Nagorao Lande. JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-