← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/134/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Tarachand Panchamji Tandekar v. Rupendarsingh Ground Water Survey Development Agency

2015-01-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.P. Bhangale1 pages

51cp134.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.134 of 2014 in Writ Petition No.3926 of 2001 (P) (Tarachand s/o. Panchmaji Tandekar .vs. Rupendarsingh, Director, Ground Water Survey Dev. Agency, Pune) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.

DATE : 5th JANUARY, 2015.

Heard Mr.S.P.Palshikar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Bharti Dangre, learned Government Pleader for the respondent.

Mrs.Bharti Dangre, learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, states that objections have been invited within fifteen days and after receipt of the objections, the case of the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.

Mr.S.P.Palshikar, learned Counsel for the petitioner states that, in view of the statement aforementioned, intervention of the Court may not be necessary.

In view of the above developments, we dispose of the present Contempt Petition.

JUDGE JUDGE jaiswalc