← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/389/2015others disposed off

Amar Lalendra Mahajan (In Jail) v. Deputy Inspector General (Prisons) (East), Nagpur And Another

2015-06-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.N. Deshmukh2 pages

wp.389.15 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.389 of 2015 (Amar Lalendra Mahajan vs.

The D.I.G. Prisons (E), Nagpur and another) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. Mir Nagman Ali, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. N.P. Mehta, A.P.P. for the Respondents.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 17, 2015.

Furlough sought by petitioner has been denied by impugned order dated 23/04/2015, because of adverse police report. Police authority at Gondia has reported the apprehension of injury by relatives of victim in the crime and possibility of commission of cognizable offence.

After hearing respective Counsel, we find that the petitioner during his furlough leave has to stay at Gondia, while the relatives of the victim, who are residing at Nagpur, have expressed fear on his releasing on furlough. Not only this, petitioner was released on furlough leave twice and on both occasions, he has surrendered voluntarily late by one day. Lastly, he was released on parole leave and he has surrendered back within time. Thus, after his release on 07/07/2011, 18/06/2013 and 15/04/2014, there was no untoward incident.

wp.389.15 2/2 In this situation, we quash and set aside the impugned order dated 23/04/2015. The respondents are directed to release the petitioner on furlough within two weeks in accordance with law.

JUDGE JUDGE *sdw