Bombay High CourtFCA/88/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Kalpana Prakash Nimaje And 1 Anor v. Prakash Pundlik Nimaje

2015-07-07Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale2 pages

1 fca88.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.88 OF 2014 [Sau. Kalpana w/o Prakash Nimaje and one .vs. Prakash (Baba) s/o Pundlik Nimje] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Hedaoo, counsel for the appellants, Shri Yuvraj Khobragade, counsel for the respondent. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATED : JULY 07, 2015.

The learned counsel for the parties have tendered a joint pursis in the court today. The same is accepted on record. The joint pursis is signed by the appellant no.1 and the respondent. The pursis is also signed by the counsel for the appellants and the counsel for the respondent. It is mentioned in the pursis that the respondent would pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- (jointly for both) per month towards permanent alimony with effect from 1.7.2015. The respondent has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- in all, per month for the appellants and also a sum of Rs.98,000/- towards the tuition classes fees in two instalments, as mentioned in clause

(2) of the joint pursis. The respondent has further agreed to pay the necessary fees for the education of the appellant no.2. The appellant no.2 shall claim the Government Scholarship and Freeship. If he is entitled to the same, the respondent would not bear the education expenses. It is stated that the respondent would not bear the educational expenses towards payment seat. The parties have agreed that the Family Court Appeal may be disposed of in terms mentioned in the joint pursis.

2 fca88.14.odt The parties are personally present in the court today. They state that they are ad idem on the terms mentioned in the joint pursis.

Hence, the Family Court Appeal is disposed of in terms of the joint pursis, with no order as to costs. A decree be drawn accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande