← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2283/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Chayya W/O Shyamnath Kumbhare Chairman, Works Committee, Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Deptt. Of Rural Development And Water Conservation And Othe

2015-06-17Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale1 pages

WP2283-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2283/2014 (CHAYYA SHYAMNATH KUMBHARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Sumeet Mendiretta, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.R. Rode, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 3.

Shri H.A. Deshpande, counsel for the R-2, 4 & 5. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 17 , 2015.

Shri Mendiretta, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the counsel has not instructions from the petitioner. It is stated that the petitioner has not approached the counsel for long despite issuance of registered communication. In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE