Dr.Punjabrao Deshmukh College Of Law,Thr.Its Principal v. Arun Vasantrao Sherekar And Anor.

WP 2415.2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

Writ Petition No.2415/2008 Dr.Punjabrao Deshmukh College of Law thorugh its Principal, Amravati. Vs Arun Vasantrao Sherekar and another __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Shri N.A.Padhye, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.B.Patil, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE, J.

DATE :

02.12.2016 The learned counsel appearing for the parties have filed joint pursis bearing St.No. 12792/2016. The contents of which are reproduced below.

"The parties above named most humbly submit as under :- 1.

That the Respondent no.2 Society has agreed to grant continuity of service to the Respondent no. 1 Employee and will pass a resolution to that effect. 2.

That, the Respondent no.1 Employee has agreed to give up all his rights as far as his back-wages and other financial dues which he may claim against the Petitioner College and Respondent no.2 Society.

3.

That, the Petitioner College and the Respondent no.2 Society have agreed to forward the documents and

WP 2415.2008 claims of the Respondent no.1 Employee for his postretirement dues to the Government/ University as the case may be and shall extend all co-operation for early release of his post-retirement dues.

4.

That, the Respondent no.1 Employee agrees that the Petitioner College and Respondent no.2 Society shall not be liable for any financial burden upon them. However they shall forward all such documents of the Respondent no.1 Employee as may be required under law for him to claim his post-retirement dues from the Government/University.

5.

That, in view of this compromise between all the parties the Writ Petition can be disposed of on these terms mentioned above."

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pursis has been signed by the petitioner and he is identified. The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 submits that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 have also signed the pursis and they are identified. The affidavit of respondent no.2 has also been filed. In view of above, the petition stands disposed of as settled between the parties as per the terms recorded above. JUDGE Andurkar