M/S Wcl (Hq) Employees Consumer Co-Society, Director Of Canteen New Delhi A-29c, Through Secretary v. State Employees Insurance Corporation, Nagpur And Anothers
wp.2352.14 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2352 OF 2014 (M/s WCL [HQ] Employees Consumer Co-Society, Nagpur vs.
Employees State Insurance Corporation, Nagpur and another) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. B.P. Maldhure, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Pushpalata Ranjan, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM
: Z.A. HAQ, J.
DATE : 21 st JUNE, 2016.
Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the matter is amicably worked out and respondent No.2 has paid the amount to respondent No.1 and, therefore, the petitioner is not pressing the petition. Ms. Pushpalata Ranjan, learned Advocate for respondent No.1 and Mrs. B.P. Maldhure, learned Advocate for respondent No.2 do not dispute the above fact. The petition is disposed as not pressed. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs. JUDGE *sdw