Bombay High CourtWP/4076/2000admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Sunil Ramlal Bhandopiya,Beed v. State Of Maharashtra And Anohter.

2016-03-21Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

wp4076.00.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4076/2000 (D) Sunil Ramlal Bhandopiya ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, PWD and anr.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A. K. Bangadkar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : MAY 6, 2016 The protection of services of the petitioner is conditional. If the petitioner has not tendered an undertaking as directed by the judgment dated 21.03.2016, the respondents may not protect the services of the petitioner. No further orders are necessary.

JUDGE JUDGE kahale